Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Care & Social Assistance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
United States
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States

60.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 87931, New Mexico 100.0% 14.8% (+85.2)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#1
2. 17247, Pennsylvania 100.0% 16.8% (+83.2)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#2
3. 12530, New York 100.0% 17.3% (+82.7)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#3
4. 89828, Nevada 100.0% 9.9% (+90.1)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#4
5. 87543, New Mexico 100.0% 14.8% (+85.2)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#5
6. 71079, Louisiana 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#6
7. 31561, Georgia 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#7
8. 83119, Wyoming 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#8
9. 46789, Indiana 100.0% 14.1% (+85.9)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#9
10. 33944, Florida 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#10
11. 21810, Maryland 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#11
12. 00786, Puerto Rico 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#12
13. 91046, California 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#13
14. 03291, New Hampshire 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#14
15. 41643, Kentucky 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#15
16. 30581, Georgia 100.0% 11.7% (+88.3)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#17
17. 77443, Texas 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#18
18. 40049, Kentucky 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#19
19. 78675, Texas 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#20
20. 24129, Virginia 100.0% 12.3% (+87.7)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#21
21. 75562, Texas 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#3 13.9% (+86.1)#22
22. 40844, Kentucky 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#3 13.9% (+86.1)#23
23. 32337, Florida 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#24
24. 43325, Ohio 100.0% 15.7% (+84.3)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#25
25. 65468, Missouri 100.0% 14.8% (+85.2)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#26
26. 39177, Mississippi 100.0% 15.4% (+84.6)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#27
27. 40350, Kentucky 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#4 13.9% (+86.1)#28
28. 71320, Louisiana 100.0% 15.2% (+84.8)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#29
29. 76848, Texas 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#4 13.9% (+86.1)#30
30. 76885, Texas 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#5 13.9% (+86.1)#31
31. 43711, Ohio 100.0% 15.7% (+84.3)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#32
32. 08064, New Jersey 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#33
33. 98558, Washington 100.0% 13.0% (+87.0)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#34
34. 27213, North Carolina 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#35
35. 27256, North Carolina 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#36
36. 33835, Florida 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#3 13.9% (+86.1)#37
37. 04541, Maine 100.0% 16.9% (+83.1)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#38
38. 36901, Alabama 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#39
39. 76685, Texas 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#6 13.9% (+86.1)#40
40. 99160, Washington 100.0% 13.0% (+87.0)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#41
41. 21675, Maryland 100.0% 13.5% (+86.5)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#42
42. 19477, Pennsylvania 100.0% 16.8% (+83.2)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#43
43. 75788, Texas 100.0% 11.9% (+88.1)#7 13.9% (+86.1)#44
44. 25699, West Virginia 100.0% 17.7% (+82.3)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#45
45. 15476, Pennsylvania 100.0% 16.8% (+83.2)#3 13.9% (+86.1)#46
46. 46786, Indiana 100.0% 14.1% (+85.9)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#47
47. 15647, Pennsylvania 100.0% 16.8% (+83.2)#4 13.9% (+86.1)#48
48. 12544, New York 100.0% 17.3% (+82.7)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#49
49. 92384, California 100.0% 12.7% (+87.3)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#50
50. 28378, North Carolina 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#3 13.9% (+86.1)#51
51. 69365, Nebraska 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#52
52. 41739, Kentucky 100.0% 14.4% (+85.6)#5 13.9% (+86.1)#53
53. 38731, Mississippi 100.0% 15.4% (+84.6)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#54
54. 13847, New York 100.0% 17.3% (+82.7)#3 13.9% (+86.1)#55
55. 24895, West Virginia 100.0% 17.7% (+82.3)#2 13.9% (+86.1)#56
56. 39148, Mississippi 100.0% 15.4% (+84.6)#3 13.9% (+86.1)#57
57. 26236, West Virginia 100.0% 17.7% (+82.3)#3 13.9% (+86.1)#58
58. 10911, New York 100.0% 17.3% (+82.7)#4 13.9% (+86.1)#59
59. 66760, Kansas 100.0% 14.1% (+85.9)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#60
60. 83354, Idaho 100.0% 13.4% (+86.6)#1 13.9% (+86.1)#61
61. 57741, South Dakota 98.1% 15.7% (+82.4)#1 13.9% (+84.2)#62
62. 95923, California 85.7% 12.7% (+73.0)#3 13.9% (+71.8)#63
63. 15447, Pennsylvania 84.8% 16.8% (+68.0)#5 13.9% (+70.9)#64
64. 40921, Kentucky 84.6% 14.4% (+70.2)#6 13.9% (+70.7)#65
65. 41838, Kentucky 83.1% 14.4% (+68.7)#7 13.9% (+69.2)#66
66. 87742, New Mexico 82.0% 14.8% (+67.2)#3 13.9% (+68.1)#67
67. 25206, West Virginia 81.9% 17.7% (+64.3)#4 13.9% (+68.0)#68
68. 87565, New Mexico 81.6% 14.8% (+66.7)#4 13.9% (+67.6)#69
69. 24606, Virginia 81.0% 12.3% (+68.7)#2 13.9% (+67.1)#70
70. 15443, Pennsylvania 81.0% 16.8% (+64.2)#6 13.9% (+67.1)#71
71. 03847, New Hampshire 80.8% 14.5% (+66.3)#2 13.9% (+66.9)#72
72. 26424, West Virginia 80.2% 17.7% (+62.5)#5 13.9% (+66.3)#73
73. 99144, Washington 80.0% 13.0% (+67.0)#3 13.9% (+66.1)#74
74. 40110, Kentucky 79.2% 14.4% (+64.7)#8 13.9% (+65.2)#75
75. 76957, Texas 78.3% 11.9% (+66.3)#8 13.9% (+64.3)#76
76. 42759, Kentucky 78.1% 14.4% (+63.7)#9 13.9% (+64.2)#77
77. 93255, California 77.1% 12.7% (+64.4)#4 13.9% (+63.2)#78
78. 01242, Massachusetts 76.1% 16.1% (+60.0)#1 13.9% (+62.2)#79
79. 78349, Texas 75.6% 11.9% (+63.7)#9 13.9% (+61.7)#80
80. 45112, Ohio 75.0% 15.7% (+59.3)#3 13.9% (+61.1)#81
81. 50041, Iowa 74.6% 14.2% (+60.4)#1 13.9% (+60.7)#82
82. 39156, Mississippi 73.6% 15.4% (+58.2)#4 13.9% (+59.6)#83
83. 04624, Maine 73.3% 16.9% (+56.5)#2 13.9% (+59.4)#84
84. 57563, South Dakota 73.3% 15.7% (+57.6)#2 13.9% (+59.4)#85
85. 15723, Pennsylvania 72.7% 16.8% (+56.0)#7 13.9% (+58.8)#86
86. 43027, Ohio 72.4% 15.7% (+56.7)#4 13.9% (+58.5)#87
87. 75934, Texas 72.1% 11.9% (+60.2)#10 13.9% (+58.2)#88
88. 39193, Mississippi 72.1% 15.4% (+56.7)#5 13.9% (+58.2)#89
89. 36454, Alabama 72.0% 13.5% (+58.5)#2 13.9% (+58.1)#90
90. 57738, South Dakota 71.6% 15.7% (+55.8)#3 13.9% (+57.6)#91
91. 15353, Pennsylvania 71.4% 16.8% (+54.7)#8 13.9% (+57.5)#92
92. 36766, Alabama 71.4% 13.5% (+57.9)#3 13.9% (+57.5)#93
93. 35573, Alabama 71.4% 13.5% (+57.9)#4 13.9% (+57.5)#94
94. 41746, Kentucky 70.6% 14.4% (+56.1)#10 13.9% (+56.6)#95
95. 78027, Texas 70.5% 11.9% (+58.5)#11 13.9% (+56.5)#96
96. 15951, Pennsylvania 70.1% 16.8% (+53.3)#9 13.9% (+56.1)#97
97. 25607, West Virginia 69.5% 17.7% (+51.8)#6 13.9% (+55.5)#98
98. 24265, Virginia 69.4% 12.3% (+57.1)#3 13.9% (+55.5)#99
99. 12161, New York 69.2% 17.3% (+51.9)#5 13.9% (+55.3)#100
100. 25544, West Virginia 69.1% 17.7% (+51.4)#7 13.9% (+55.2)#101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States?
87931 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Care & Social Assistance in the United States is 13.9%.