Nicaraguan vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,366,718 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.265% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 265.0 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,372 compared to $53,874, a difference of 36.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,751 compared to $119,496, a difference of 36.2%), and median family income ($92,231 compared to $125,312, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $58,239, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $46,481, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 67.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 41.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.8%), family households (67.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 45.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 94.0%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 65.6%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.66%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.7%).