Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,641,395 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.200. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.173% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 172.8 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,267 compared to $125,312, a difference of 42.0%), per capita income ($38,065 compared to $53,874, a difference of 41.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,914 compared to $119,496, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $58,239, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $46,481, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 79.1%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.45%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 50.3%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 45.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (67.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 114.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 74.9%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.18%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%).