Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,154,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 30.6 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $119,496, a difference of 45.3%), per capita income ($39,529 compared to $53,874, a difference of 36.3%), and median household income ($77,559 compared to $105,262, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.3%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $70,238, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $58,239, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 46.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 44.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.2%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 38.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (61.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.61%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 53.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%).