Immigrants from Portugal vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,713,341 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.530. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.146% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 146.2 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,412 compared to $53,874, a difference of 27.0%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $70,238, a difference of 25.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $119,496, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $58,239, a difference of 7.6%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $46,481, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 48.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 43.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.57%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 92.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 83.9%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.24%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 79.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.0%).