Choctaw vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,161,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 14.5 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $119,496, a difference of 52.9%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $105,262, a difference of 50.5%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $53,874, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $58,239, a difference of 28.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $70,238, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 74.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 61.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 55.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 46.0%), single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.4%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.89%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 78.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 102.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 101.2%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 86.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 85.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.3%).