Navajo vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,550,558 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 9.5 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $53,874, a difference of 85.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $119,496, a difference of 79.6%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $105,262, a difference of 77.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.3%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $58,239, a difference of 37.4%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $46,481, a difference of 40.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.8%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 143.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 134.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 52.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 54.6%), and single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 56.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 114.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 111.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 105.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 103.8%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 73.2%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.65 compared to 3.24, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 49.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 4.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 127.0%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 116.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 115.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 74.9%), hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 71.2%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.4%).