Immigrants from Brazil vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 333,347,933 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.144% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 143.6 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,534 compared to $119,496, a difference of 18.9%), median household income ($90,907 compared to $105,262, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,470 compared to $122,343, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $58,239, a difference of 6.9%), and per capita income ($48,164 compared to $53,874, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 30.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.53%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%).