Icelander vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,227,932 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.111% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to a decrease of 110.5 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,560 compared to $119,496, a difference of 25.1%), median household income ($85,797 compared to $105,262, a difference of 22.7%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $125,312, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $58,239, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $70,238, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.5%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.7%), poverty (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 28.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.4%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.10%), currently married (47.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.5%).