Immigrants from Israel vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,976,168 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.332% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 332.4 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.8%), per capita income ($57,384 compared to $53,874, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $58,239, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,893 compared to $122,343, a difference of 0.45%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $70,238, a difference of 0.55%), and median female earnings ($46,902 compared to $46,481, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%), single female poverty (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.43%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.2%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (63.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.26%), births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and female disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.0%).