Immigrants from Indonesia vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,630,542 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Indonesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Indonesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.209% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Indonesia corresponds to a decrease of 209.3 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,195 compared to $53,874, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,627 compared to $119,496, a difference of 11.0%), and median family income ($115,162 compared to $125,312, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,521 compared to $58,239, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,694 compared to $70,238, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.68%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.13%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.69%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.76%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (47.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.8%).