Immigrants from Nigeria vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,997,798 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to a decrease of 56.3 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $119,496, a difference of 38.0%), per capita income ($40,339 compared to $53,874, a difference of 33.6%), and median family income ($96,439 compared to $125,312, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $46,481, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $58,239, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 40.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 53.5%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 40.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 0.32%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 65.8%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 59.7%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 2nd grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%).