Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,556,172 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 53.5 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $67,594, a difference of 10.7%), median household income ($90,549 compared to $99,933, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $116,566, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.82%), householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $56,379, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $44,198, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.5%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 7.9%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.27%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.22%), ged/equivalency (86.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.0%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.4%).