Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,946,362 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 13.0 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($108,570 compared to $92,837, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $91,462, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $53,722, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $38,644, a difference of 7.7%), and per capita income ($45,979 compared to $41,195, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 46.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 43.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.6%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.0%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 125.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 38.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 17.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 37.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 48.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.94%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.1%).