Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,428,865 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 15.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $90,372, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $50,609, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $59,837, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $40,257, a difference of 3.4%), and median earnings ($49,633 compared to $46,564, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and male poverty (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.21%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.0%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (65.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.8%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.10%), bachelor's degree (39.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.7%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.7%).