Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,707,094 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $91,171, a difference of 10.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $96,086, a difference of 10.6%), and median male earnings ($58,452 compared to $52,860, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,979 compared to $43,997, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $52,302, a difference of 6.1%), and median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $38,945, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 26.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.62%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.77%), and family households (65.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.0%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and bachelor's degree (39.0% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), female disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%).