Immigrants from Poland vs Chinese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
 Chinese
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Chinese
16.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Chinese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,838,376 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Chinese | 
| Minimum | 5.9% | 10.5% | 
| Maximum | 20.9% | 30.0% | 
| Range | 15.0% | 19.5% | 
| Mean | 14.8% | 16.3% | 
| Median | 14.2% | 16.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 13.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 17.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (16.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Scotland (16.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (16.2%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% | 
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% | 
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Eastern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 16.3% | 
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 16.3% |