Immigrants from Poland vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,837,264 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.323% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 1,323.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($58,452 compared to $49,711, a difference of 17.6%), per capita income ($45,979 compared to $39,558, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $88,018, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $60,748, a difference of 0.48%), householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $54,000, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $38,202, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 47.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 44.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.99%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 61.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 59.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.8%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.3%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 64.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.8%), bachelor's degree (39.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 32.7%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (89.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 130.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.7%).