Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Poland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Poland

Hmong

Good
Average
7,802
SOCIAL INDEX
75.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
104th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Poland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,503,903 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.993. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 30.1 Hmong.
Immigrants from Poland Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($58,452 compared to $48,254, a difference of 21.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $88,115, a difference of 20.7%), and per capita income ($45,979 compared to $38,120, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $56,339, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $49,364, a difference of 12.4%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PolandHmong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,979
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,570
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,549
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,633
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,452
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,630
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,474
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,065
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,319
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,041
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (18.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 24.6%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.92%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PolandHmong
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Average
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.91%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PolandHmong
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PolandHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.6%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.3%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.12%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PolandHmong
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.9%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PolandHmong
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.6%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.6%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.6%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and bachelor's degree (39.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PolandHmong
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.5%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.2%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.1%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.0%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.1%).
Immigrants from Poland vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PolandHmong
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%