Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Norway Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,821,188 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Norway. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Immigrants from Norway.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,979 compared to $52,217, a difference of 13.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $50,984, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $66,118, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $42,837, a difference of 2.9%), and median earnings ($49,633 compared to $51,758, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 25.0%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and single female poverty (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.35%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in family households (65.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.1%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.60%), currently married (48.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.24%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.8%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 40.9%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Norway communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%).