Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,142,761 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 22.4 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $78,045, a difference of 29.5%), median household income ($90,549 compared to $71,801, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $85,207, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $54,512, a difference of 12.0%), median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $36,017, a difference of 15.6%), and per capita income ($45,979 compared to $38,848, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 46.6%), male poverty (9.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.9%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.36%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (65.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.74%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.6%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and bachelor's degree (39.0% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.16%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.2%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.0%).