Immigrants from Poland vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,333,092 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to a decrease of 9.0 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $51,678, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $64,658, a difference of 5.9%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,549 compared to $90,446, a difference of 0.11%), median male earnings ($58,452 compared to $58,588, a difference of 0.23%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $100,457, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.91%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.8%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.9%).