Yakama vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yakama
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yakama
Tsimshian
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Yakama Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,715,764 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 17.7 Tsimshian.
Yakama vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $97,809, a difference of 28.3%), per capita income ($33,009 compared to $40,344, a difference of 22.2%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $101,543, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.53%), householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $58,202, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Yakama | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,009 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,932 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,225 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,107 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,002 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,354 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,321 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,226 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,992 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,234 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Yakama vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (22.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 96.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 57.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and male poverty (15.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.5%).
Poverty Metric | Yakama | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 13.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 18.0% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.8% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 15.7% |
Yakama vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 74.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 72.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Yakama | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.5% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 8.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.1% | Poor 5.6% |
Yakama vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yakama | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.8% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 77.4% |
Yakama vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.8%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 40.0%), and family households with children (30.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.3%), births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.25, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Yakama | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.8% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.45 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.3% | Tragic 42.2% |
Yakama vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 109.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 62.4%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yakama | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 31.0% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 12.9% | Fair 6.2% |
Yakama vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 114.4%), college, 1 year or more (46.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and college, under 1 year (52.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Education Level Metric | Yakama | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 86.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.0% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 82.5% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 80.0% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 74.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.6% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 46.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Yakama vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 141.1%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Yakama | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.00% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.6% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.3% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |