Yakama vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Tsimshian

Poor
Average
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 5,715,764 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 17.7 Tsimshian.
Yakama Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Yakama vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $97,809, a difference of 28.3%), per capita income ($33,009 compared to $40,344, a difference of 22.2%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $101,543, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.53%), householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $54,649, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $58,202, a difference of 3.5%).
Yakama vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricYakamaTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Exceptional
23.9%

Yakama vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (22.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 96.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 57.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and male poverty (15.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.5%).
Yakama vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaTsimshian
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
15.7%

Yakama vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 74.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 72.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Yakama vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaTsimshian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Poor
5.6%

Yakama vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Yakama vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
77.4%

Yakama vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.8%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 40.0%), and family households with children (30.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.3%), births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.25, a difference of 6.1%).
Yakama vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaTsimshian
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Tragic
42.2%

Yakama vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 109.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 62.4%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.9%).
Yakama vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Fair
6.2%

Yakama vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 114.4%), college, 1 year or more (46.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and college, under 1 year (52.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 2.3%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Yakama vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Yakama vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 141.1%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.0%).
Yakama vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricYakamaTsimshian
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%