Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Costa Ricans
Tsimshian
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Costa Rican Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,510,142 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.144% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 144.2 Tsimshian.
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $48,836, a difference of 11.2%), per capita income ($44,090 compared to $40,344, a difference of 9.3%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $43,695, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $39,530, a difference of 0.23%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $97,809, a difference of 2.4%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $101,543, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,090 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,989 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,262 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,645 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,279 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,622 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,106 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,565 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,779 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,638 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.1%), receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.5%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Average 9.0% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.0% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 151.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 70.9%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Unemployment Metric | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Poor 5.6% |
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.3% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 77.4% |
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 28.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.22%), family households (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.9% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.6%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.4% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.6% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.7% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Average 15.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Costa Rican vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 60.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.2%).
Disability Metric | Costa Rican | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.6% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.9% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |