Hungarian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hungarian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hungarians
Tsimshian
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Hungarian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,269,427 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.970. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.015% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 1,014.6 Tsimshian.
Hungarian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.6%), median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.3%), and per capita income ($45,426 compared to $40,344, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $39,530, a difference of 0.050%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,544 compared to $97,809, a difference of 0.27%), and median family income ($105,609 compared to $101,543, a difference of 4.0%).
Income Metric | Hungarian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,426 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,609 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,920 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,795 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,309 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,510 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,247 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,544 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,913 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,673 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Hungarian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 45.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 44.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and female poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.67%).
Poverty Metric | Hungarian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Good 13.2% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.2% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.9% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Hungarian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 150.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 76.1%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Hungarian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Poor 5.6% |
Hungarian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hungarian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.8% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.3% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.5% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.7% | Tragic 77.4% |
Hungarian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 34.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.68%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Hungarian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.1% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 42.2% |
Hungarian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hungarian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.8% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Hungarian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.8%), master's degree (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 11th grade (94.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and 10th grade (95.3% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Hungarian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.5% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.3% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.4% |
Hungarian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 55.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.6%).
Disability Metric | Hungarian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |