Immigrants from Uruguay vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,450,336 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 47.6 Tsimshian.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $40,344, a difference of 9.0%), median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $97,809, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $96,783, a difference of 0.73%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $83,346, a difference of 0.95%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $39,530, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.0%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 158.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 77.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (58.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 95.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 71.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%).