Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Tsimshian

Fair
Average
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 8,770,483 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to a decrease of 14.6 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $97,809, a difference of 35.5%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $54,649, a difference of 26.3%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $83,346, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.1%), median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $48,836, a difference of 10.5%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $43,695, a difference of 11.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
23.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 98.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoTsimshian
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
15.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 171.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 94.8%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoTsimshian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
77.4%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.1%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.59%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.97%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoTsimshian
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
42.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.2%), bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 16.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 125.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 14.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoTsimshian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%