Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Tsimshian

Poor
Average
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,713,976 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.915. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 44.5 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($92,837 compared to $101,543, a difference of 9.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $97,809, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $58,202, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $54,649, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($44,462 compared to $43,695, a difference of 1.8%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $40,344, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
23.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 68.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTsimshian
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
15.7%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 117.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 52.8%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTsimshian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Poor
5.6%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.81%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
77.4%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 24.9%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTsimshian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Tragic
42.2%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 177.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.4%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 86.2%), bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 115.1%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 90.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.43%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 24.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorTsimshian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%