Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Tsimshian
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,713,976 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.915. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 44.5 Tsimshian.
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($92,837 compared to $101,543, a difference of 9.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $97,809, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $58,202, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $54,649, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($44,462 compared to $43,695, a difference of 1.8%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $40,344, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,195 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,837 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,341 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,462 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,474 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,644 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,722 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,673 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,462 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,030 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 68.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.31%), male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 117.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 52.8%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.9% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.6% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 20.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.81%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 77.4% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 24.9%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.7% | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 177.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 42.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 86.2%), bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.7% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.7% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 115.1%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 90.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.43%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 24.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |