Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Tsimshian

Good
Average
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tsimshian Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 2,633,186 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 21.3 Tsimshian.
Taiwanese Integration in Tsimshian Communities

Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,455 compared to $40,344, a difference of 15.1%), median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $54,649, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $39,530, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $97,809, a difference of 3.8%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.3%).
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseTsimshian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Tragic
$40,344
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Fair
$101,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Fair
$83,346
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Tragic
$43,695
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Tragic
$48,836
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Average
$39,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Exceptional
$54,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Excellent
$97,809
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Poor
$96,783
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Tragic
$58,202
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
23.9%

Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 42.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseTsimshian
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
8.8%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Good
13.1%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Exceptional
26.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.7%

Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 158.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 90.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 76.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseTsimshian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
10.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.6%

Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseTsimshian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Excellent
37.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
88.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
77.4%

Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 45.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.5%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.56%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.2%).
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseTsimshian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
42.2%

Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.2%).
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseTsimshian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Fair
6.2%

Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.5%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseTsimshian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Poor
57.9%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.4%

Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 83.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 69.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 23.0%).
Taiwanese vs Tsimshian Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseTsimshian
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
32.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
59.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%