Panamanian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Panamanian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Panamanians
Tsimshian
2,119
SOCIAL INDEX
18.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
268th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Panamanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,782,131 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.774. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.375% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 374.9 Tsimshian.
Panamanian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,193 compared to $97,809, a difference of 8.4%), median male earnings ($52,835 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $54,649, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $58,202, a difference of 0.11%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,066 compared to $96,783, a difference of 0.75%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $39,530, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Panamanian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,035 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,683 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,272 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,593 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,835 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,049 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,611 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,193 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,066 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,266 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Panamanian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 53.2%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.82%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.3%).
Poverty Metric | Panamanian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Panamanian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 139.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 65.2%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.82%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Panamanian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Panamanian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Panamanian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.1% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 77.4% |
Panamanian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 23.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.13%), family households (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Panamanian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.3% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 42.2% |
Panamanian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 46.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Panamanian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Panamanian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.2%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and bachelor's degree (36.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.070%), college, 1 year or more (58.3% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.95%).
Education Level Metric | Panamanian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.8% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.3% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 45.1% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.5% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Panamanian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 83.6%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 56.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Disability Metric | Panamanian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |