Comanche vs Tsimshian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
 Tsimshian
 Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Tsimshian
16.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Tsimshian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,456,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,184,225 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 44.6%.
 
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Tsimshian | 
| Minimum | 12.5% | 0.66% | 
| Maximum | 59.4% | 35.0% | 
| Range | 46.9% | 34.3% | 
| Mean | 29.8% | 14.1% | 
| Median | 27.4% | 11.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.6% | 6.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.9% | 20.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 14.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 10.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 10.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307  | Tragic 15.7%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310  | Tragic 15.9%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311  | Tragic 16.0%  | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312  | Tragic 16.0%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 16.2%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 16.3%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 16.4%  | 
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 11.3%  |