Navajo vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Navajo
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Navajo
Tsimshian
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Navajo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,296,903 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Tsimshian.
Navajo vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $97,809, a difference of 47.0%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $101,543, a difference of 43.0%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $83,346, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($42,098 compared to $48,836, a difference of 16.0%), and median earnings ($36,999 compared to $43,695, a difference of 18.1%).
Income Metric | Navajo | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,031 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $70,989 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $59,159 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,999 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,098 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,046 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $42,380 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $66,529 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $69,759 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $47,722 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Navajo vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (30.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 165.6%), single father poverty (29.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 130.2%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 128.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.6%), receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 33.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 42.8%).
Poverty Metric | Navajo | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Tragic 18.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 22.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 23.9% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 30.3% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 40.2% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.5% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Navajo vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 104.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 67.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (16.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (18.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Navajo | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Tragic 7.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 29.0% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.7% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Poor 5.6% |
Navajo vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (73.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 13.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Navajo | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.6% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 32.1% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 64.8% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.6% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 77.4% |
Navajo vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 47.2%), currently married (39.0% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.42%), family households (66.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Navajo | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.1% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.65 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.0% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 42.2% |
Navajo vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.70%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Navajo | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Fair 6.2% |
Navajo vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.5%), bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and master's degree (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.91%).
Education Level Metric | Navajo | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.1% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.2% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.5% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.3% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.8% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Navajo vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.8%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 1.3%), hearing disability (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (58.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Navajo | Tsimshian |
Disability | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 33.3% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 58.3% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.6% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |