Immigrants from Thailand vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 308,436,580 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 104.5 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $84,235, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $90,691, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,810 compared to $38,391, a difference of 1.1%), median earnings ($45,598 compared to $44,118, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $48,691, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 13.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.8%), births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.4%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 11th grade (91.6% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.9%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%).