Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Sub-Saharan Africans

Tragic
Tragic
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Subsaharan African Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,103,472 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 69.8 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $40,152, a difference of 32.7%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $93,748, a difference of 29.9%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $50,408, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $48,691, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $56,615, a difference of 15.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamSubsaharan African
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Tragic
$40,152
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Tragic
$93,748
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Tragic
$77,631
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Tragic
$44,118
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Tragic
$50,408
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Tragic
$38,391
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Tragic
$48,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Tragic
$84,235
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Tragic
$90,691
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Tragic
$56,615
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 98.0%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 87.9%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.0%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 40.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamSubsaharan African
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
20.1%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
23.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Tragic
31.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 87.5%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 70.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 68.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamSubsaharan African
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 9.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamSubsaharan African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
75.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Tragic
82.0%

Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 56.6%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 36.0%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households (67.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamSubsaharan African
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
41.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
36.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamSubsaharan African
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 46.7%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 46.6%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamSubsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Tragic
63.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Tragic
57.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
43.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Tragic
35.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 67.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.8%).
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamSubsaharan African
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.6%