Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Subsaharan African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Sub-Saharan Africans
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Subsaharan African Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,121,622 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 15.9 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $38,391, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $56,615, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $84,235, a difference of 0.66%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $50,408, a difference of 2.1%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $40,152, a difference of 2.7%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $40,152 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Tragic $93,748 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Tragic $77,631 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $44,118 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $50,408 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $38,391 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $48,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Tragic $84,235 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Tragic $90,691 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Tragic $56,615 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 12.0%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 22.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 20.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 20.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 23.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 31.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 11.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 38.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 75.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 82.0% |
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 41.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 36.7% |
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 87.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 51.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 63.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 57.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 43.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Fair 1.8% |
Iroquois vs Subsaharan African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.3%), male disability (13.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Subsaharan African |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |