Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,663,777 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.100% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 99.8 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $48,691, a difference of 12.4%), wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $84,235, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,665 compared to $93,748, a difference of 0.98%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $90,691, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $56,615, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.29%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 27.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (43.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (63.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 111.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 42.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.6%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 53.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.34%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%).