Immigrants from Uganda vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,630,897 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.995% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 995.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $90,691, a difference of 14.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,698 compared to $84,235, a difference of 13.6%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $93,748, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,739 compared to $38,391, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $48,691, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($48,041 compared to $44,118, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.49%), family households (62.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 22.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.7%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.64%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.0%).