Immigrants from Lebanon vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,350,073 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to a decrease of 59.5 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,124 compared to $84,235, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $90,691, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $48,691, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $38,391, a difference of 7.3%), and median earnings ($49,682 compared to $44,118, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.6%), receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (17.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 44.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.30 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (65.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 44.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 33.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.7%).