Zimbabwean vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,193,619 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.791% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 791.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $90,691, a difference of 17.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $93,748, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $84,235, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $48,691, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,391, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $44,118, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 48.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 35.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.31%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.2%).