Immigrants from Ukraine vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,510,077 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Ukraine communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.416. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ukraine within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.095% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ukraine corresponds to a decrease of 95.1 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,664 compared to $84,235, a difference of 21.9%), per capita income ($48,134 compared to $40,152, a difference of 19.9%), and median male earnings ($59,820 compared to $50,408, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,163 compared to $56,615, a difference of 8.0%), wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($43,069 compared to $38,391, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 35.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 33.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.4%), births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (50.9% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.0%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and bachelor's degree (41.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ukraine and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.1%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.3%).