Chinese vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,983,932 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.682% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 1,682.1 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,615, a difference of 36.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $90,691, a difference of 28.1%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $77,631, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $38,391, a difference of 8.0%), median earnings ($48,836 compared to $44,118, a difference of 10.7%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $50,408, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 68.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 66.9%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.3%), female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 55.0%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 48.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.3%), associate's degree (48.5% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.37%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%).