French American Indian vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,125,059 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 65.9 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 11.1%), median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $38,391, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $56,615, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($40,244 compared to $40,152, a difference of 0.23%), median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $50,408, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $48,691, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 9.3%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and single female poverty (24.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.41%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.6%), married-couple households (44.1% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (62.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.5%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and male disability (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.9%).