Chinese vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,068,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $65,326, a difference of 18.6%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,540, a difference of 10.7%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $49,173, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $104,578, a difference of 0.30%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $114,553, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,542, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.99%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.2%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households (68.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 59.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 52.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 31.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.3%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.3%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%).