Barbadian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,674,730 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 15.1 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 40.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $111,602, a difference of 23.6%), and median family income ($93,919 compared to $114,553, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $52,540, a difference of 0.65%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $42,542, a difference of 3.1%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $51,038, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 57.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.5%), single female poverty (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 98.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 44.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 71.3%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.6%).