Asian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,281,007 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $52,540, a difference of 8.5%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $93,971, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $104,578, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $49,173, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($119,955 compared to $114,553, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 18.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 5.7%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.28%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (49.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.8%), family households (66.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.6%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.3%).