Uruguayan vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,869,017 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 35.9 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,656 compared to $114,553, a difference of 13.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $111,602, a difference of 13.1%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $60,350, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $52,540, a difference of 0.14%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $42,542, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 14.9%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.84%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.39%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 0.32%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 56.0%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.5%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%).