Indonesian vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,250,101 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Indonesian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indonesians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indonesians corresponds to an increase of 32.7 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,300 compared to $49,173, a difference of 31.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,543 compared to $104,578, a difference of 31.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,890 compared to $111,602, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,566 compared to $52,540, a difference of 15.3%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and median female earnings ($36,140 compared to $42,542, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 38.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.3%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (61.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.28 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 67.1%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.3%).