Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,408,261 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,288 compared to $111,602, a difference of 18.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,819 compared to $104,578, a difference of 17.7%), and median household income ($79,888 compared to $93,971, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,565 compared to $52,540, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($38,886 compared to $42,542, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 9.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and female poverty (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.7%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.69%), family households (61.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 32.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 65.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 53.3%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.0% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.97%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.4%).