Pennsylvania German vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,475,159 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.051. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 38.0 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,842 compared to $49,173, a difference of 29.9%), median family income ($91,763 compared to $114,553, a difference of 24.8%), and median household income ($75,814 compared to $93,971, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $52,540, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $60,350, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.2%), single male poverty (15.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 66.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 31.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 21.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.11%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 106.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 99.9%), and master's degree (10.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 70.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.0%).