Immigrants from Congo vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,005,976 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 57.4 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $104,578, a difference of 44.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $111,602, a difference of 43.4%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $93,971, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $52,540, a difference of 21.4%), wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 22.8%), and median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $42,542, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.89%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 40.2%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.98%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and family households (59.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 73.1%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 68.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%).